Technologies and Asylum Procedures

After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures across Europe, fresh technologies are reviving these systems. Coming from lie detection tools analyzed at the border to a program for validating documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of technologies is being made use of in asylum applications. This article is exploring how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. This reveals how asylum seekers will be transformed into required hindered techno-users: They are asked to conform to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unpredictable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their particular capacity to browse these systems and to go after their right for protection.

It also displays how these technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering them from being able to access the channels of cover. It further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms of these technologies, by which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects who all are regimented by their reliability on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal understanding, the article states that these technologies have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double result: when they assist with expedite the asylum method, they also make it difficult designed for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are really positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to bogus decisions made by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their situations. Moreover, they will pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.